1
10
1
-
https://s3.amazonaws.com/atg-prod-oaas-files/hist1952/original/011bf8223e317cbdf6fbc7cace39a829.jpg
07d70d45407bae9e8ab9a7dd17d3396d
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Tourism, Proximity and British Perceptions of France and Germany Before the First World War
Description
An account of the resource
This collection explores British perceptions of France and Germany before the First World War, and how they were influenced by proximity, both in terms of simple distance and in terms of how easy it was to travel there. There are four elements (one of which isn't a historical map). <br />The first is a graphical representation of the quickest routes from London to different places in Europe, as advised by Thomas Cook and Son travel agents in 1913, and how long it would take to travel to each destination. These graphs give us a sense of how far places in Europe actually were from London in 1913 (admittedly a limited sense given I haven’t found useful information on the prices of these journeys, or how many times a day they ran). They also show which places routes ran through, thus showing which places travelllers would be familiar with simply by having to frequently pass through.<br />The second map is a cartoon map of Europe made in 1900. It supposedly shows the different countries responding to Britain’s war in South Africa. It is interesting for how France—at the time far from an ally—is shown as far less threatening than Germany, which in turn is less threatening than Russia. It is interesting to apply information from the previous element to this one (if we assume that travel patterns in Europe had not radically changed between 1900 and 1913). The relative proximity of France, and number of routes through Paris, perhaps meant that more people had been there, and did not find it excessively foreign or sinister, while the distantness of Russia (Moscow is 102 hours from London) arguably result in it being depicted as a terrifying, autocratic octopus (a depiction surely grounded in common British stereotypes and attitudes). <br />The third element seeks to answer a question posed by the comparison of the first and second. The first element shows that Germany was not very distant, and that many routes passed through it, especially through Cologne. Yet the second shows that Germany seemed to be more foreign and threatening than France. The third element is a map of Europe made in 1880. It labels western Germany—the Rhineland that accounts for so many nodes in the first element—“Germany,” and the rest of the German Empire “Prussia.” While it was probably the result of parsimonious atlas makers reusing pre-unification plates, the existence of such a map (and of other examples, which are hyperlinked), suggests that the British maintained a mental distinction between the Germany they encountered and the threatening, militaristic Prussia they did not. Either that map echoes a distinction that was already salient, or it and others helped to create or maintain such a distinction. It is no accident that Germany is represented in element two by the Kaiser eagerly stockpiling battleships, echoing a pre-unification cartoon map of <a href="http://maps.bpl.org/id/16826">Prussia</a>, in which that state is embodied by the Kaiser and an armed and dangerous Bismark.<br />The last element is a fragment of a map of Paris from an English language guidebook published in 1878. It gives us a loose sense of what sort of places would have grounded British perceptions of the French capital. Specifically, government buildings feature prominently, suggesting that visiting Paris in some way entailed visiting the French state, and perhaps coming to understand it as similar to the British state. One might wonder whether visitors to Berlin would have had the same response to the German state, had many people visited Berlin.
Historical Map
Fill out as many of these fields as possible. Required Dublin core fields include Title, Description, Publisher
Cartographer
Frederick W. Rose (original sketch)
Engraver
Matthew B. Hewerdine
Type
individual map, atlas sheet, book figure, part of bound collection, born-digital
individual map
Format notes
49 x 70cm
Repository
Library of Congress Geography and Map Division Washington, D.C. 20540-4650 USA dcu
Call Number
G5701.S1 1900 .R6
URL or Unique Identifier
<a href="http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g5701s.ct002860">http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g5701s.ct002860</a>
Digital Repository
<a href="https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=STNO&searchArg=2010587002&searchType=1&recCount=10">https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=STNO&searchArg=2010587002&searchType=1&recCount=10</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
John Bull and his friends: a serio-comic map of Europe
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Frederick W. Rose
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
G.W. Bacon & Co., Ltd., London
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
1900
Description
An account of the resource
This British cartoon map of Europe paints a belligerently nationalistic view of diplomatic relations in 1900. John Bull, Britain personified, is swatting away two cats -- Boer troops resisting British rule in South Africa -- while the rest of Europe condemns or conspires against him. What is significant about this map is the way that France is portrayed as less sinister than Germany, which is less sinister than Russia. While Marianne is shown looking glumly at broken toys labelled with the names of political and diplomatic incidents, Germany is represented by the Kaiser in uniform stockpiling battleships and exports, and Russia is an octopus with the Czar at its centre. One could argue that proximity is the defining factor: France is close to England and had perhaps been visited by the artist and his expected reader. Russia on the other hand is a very long way away, and thus understandably more sinister. Germany is between the two.
Type
The nature or genre of the resource
Historical Cartoon Map
Language
A language of the resource
English
Coverage
The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant
Continental
1900
1900s
Britain
caricature
cartoon
nationalism
pictorial map
stereotypes